Search found 105 matches

Go to advanced search

by divstands
Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:54 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Ruleset for standardinzing Mexican Ta Payer ID/ IFE/ etc
Replies: 7
Views: 3530

DvStand, Definitely you can develop a Rule Set to accomplish your requirement using Pattern Action Language. It work for any complex or single string. You would like to use operand substring, length, template -PICT allows test special format like your) ... among others. There are some example of ho...
by divstands
Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:06 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Ruleset for standardinzing Mexican Ta Payer ID/ IFE/ etc
Replies: 7
Views: 3530

From where I sit, the answer is "almost certainly not" unless you can track down someone who has already built one. If IBM had one they probably would have shipped it. ... hmm... true. Now: is there a possibility to make a rule for 'identifying a string characater by character, analyzing ...
by divstands
Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:01 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP
Replies: 12
Views: 7689

You can get as creative as you want.... I suppose you could add such logic to the QS job....although "on the fly" fixing is not usually where I've seen standaridation and investigation being used. Exceptions are found, rules are tweaked, overrides created, and then one less exception resu...
by divstands
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:09 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP
Replies: 12
Views: 7689

ray.wurlod wrote:During real time you pass back the standardized result, "for better or worse". ...
yeah i understand that as the first thought solution(mean it), but currently the client wants to handle the error ifever there exist any unhandled part in the supplied address.
by divstands
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:07 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Ruleset for standardinzing Mexican Ta Payer ID/ IFE/ etc
Replies: 7
Views: 3530

Ruleset for standardinzing Mexican Ta Payer ID/ IFE/ etc

I want to know whether a ruleset exist for standardizing Mexican IFE/ RFC or CURP(counter part of US TAXID). I tried searching on IBM site but am unable to find a link which gives the list of countries and the entities for which the rulesets exist. Also, IBM personnel support is minimal, hence the q...
by divstands
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:04 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP
Replies: 12
Views: 7689

Aren't you always sending back the response? Wouldn't your unhandled pattern appear in either a direct stan or possibly investigate result? ...regardless? (assuming the process flow is finally working). Ernie Yeah the process flow is finally working but the results of investigate and unhandled patt...
by divstands
Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:02 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP
Replies: 12
Views: 7689

...missed your line about it working fine in the sample other job.... This sounds oddly like it could also be an end-of-wave problem. If it is still occuring, try this: Right before your WISDOutput put in a Transformer with two output links. Send the first output link to a flat file or Peek ....the...
by divstands
Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:31 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: ´Select´ Stage Error
Replies: 7
Views: 4367

Not able to figure out how to create the "reject handling output link" yet, but

when i removed the postal code and kept the inputs limited to :
Address Line 1(Basic)
City
State

Only, then all the records passed through the filter
by divstands
Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:25 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP
Replies: 12
Views: 7689

Standardization job along with WISD IP/OP

I built a job for address standardization. The job looks like: Seq File->Standardize(Country.set)->Filter->Standardize(MXADDR.set)->Seq File Now in place of the input and output Sequential files, I attached WISD Input and WISD output Stages respectively. The job with the above configuration is not g...
by divstands
Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:00 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: ´Select´ Stage Error
Replies: 7
Views: 4367

before standardizing the addresses for the job as explained above. Additional Info: It is a Mexican Client, hence, only MExican data is present in the downstream sources. That sounds like quite an assumption you're making there. Check the records that have been excluded to make sure. Also, alternat...
by divstands
Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:57 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: ´Select´ Stage Error
Replies: 7
Views: 4367

stuartjvnorton wrote:
divstands wrote:before standardizing the addresses for the job as explained above.
Additional Info: It is a Mexican Client, hence, only MExican data is present in the downstream sources.
That sounds like quite an assumption you're making there.
Check the records that have been excluded to make sure.
by divstands
Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:28 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: ´Select´ Stage Error
Replies: 7
Views: 4367

DivStand, Probably the missing records has been identified with another ISO country code .....different than MX By the way the Select stage is previous to 8.x, and has been deprecated in version 8.x. You could use switch, transform or filter stages as a replacement Using a transformer you could add...
by divstands
Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:40 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: IP overrides not working
Replies: 12
Views: 5343

Hence it confirms that i do ot need the a "renamed copy of the rules again" My query was related to whether it was a v7.5 ruleset. Like I said elsewhere, the format for naming the override files changed between versions. eg: the Input Pattern Override file for the MXADDR ruleset would be ...
by divstands
Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:36 am
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: IP overrides not working
Replies: 12
Views: 5343

ray.wurlod wrote:Why have you suddenly introduced unhandled pattern overrides into the story? When do you want the overrides to occur - as input records are being processed or after standardization has occurred? I ...
It is not sudden Ray, but the answer to a question. Please check.
by divstands
Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:21 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: IP overrides not working
Replies: 12
Views: 5343

What would you like to do with the Input Pattern that you posted? Please post the business requirements ... or try to explain in more details what you did so we can be of more help ... Say there are three input Patterns: > T + ^++ > T +^+ + ^B > T ++^+LII+ + Now, say after standardization, all the ...

Go to advanced search