I'm an East Coast COBOL dinosaur, ff. Started in 1990, and about 80% of my ETL development is for MF data dependencies.
I keep forgetting that the using MF data FAQ is linked in my post signature. I wrote it (pats self on back) and you may find it helpful in a general way.
Search found 733 matches
- Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: COBOL CFD table import fails on character string format
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4059
- Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:08 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Grasping at straws: Unix-mainframe FTP performance
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4516
Updates on things learned: Paul, the datasets are all newly created in the current cycle. Migration is not an issue, but I do have observations that it would not cause this sort of performance loss. qt_ky: Interesting suggestion, but it can't fit, because MF-Unix connectivity is very different from ...
- Fri Sep 15, 2017 2:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Grasping at straws: Unix-mainframe FTP performance
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4516
Paul, Single server/gateway, with load balancing dynamic on three LPARs. EDIT: server configuration limits number of data ports in use, and has disabled the active/passive command attribute. I've confirmed that this is not a data port issue. There's no gateway (or firewall) between the Unix server a...
- Fri Sep 15, 2017 1:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: COBOL CFD table import fails on character string format
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4059
- Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Grasping at straws: Unix-mainframe FTP performance
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4516
Grasping at straws: Unix-mainframe FTP performance
Hoping that someone may have had anything similar, about which you can share any details with me here. The situation: We have jobs that loop through FTP sessions, one at a time, to get mainframe datasets and land them on our DataStage server. Tracing indicates that ACK is delayed, with only 3 or 4 d...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: CFF Stage and special or non-printable characters (again)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4203
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:55 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Paramètre entre job
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3264
- Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Create SQL statements instead of using database stages
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9080
Some basic questions you may already have covered. My intention is to isolate the potential causes. Have you done a simple replacement of the connector channel? By this I mean writing to a local file, using FTP to land the data on the mainframe, or setting up a test channel with some other DBMS like...
- Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Unexpected results from IF THEN clause
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4400
It depends on the priority of the conditions. If a condition you know to be true is not being evaluated, it's because a lower priority condition is true first. Break out your logic into single statements, and do a final logic check based on the priority of the true conditions. Or, as I've found help...
- Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Convert MF Date CYYMMDD to DD-MMM-YY:00:00:00
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7335
What's the rental fee? :) I assign no fault to anyone faced with mainframe and especially Cobol formatted data for the first time or without any background in mainframe development. I've been dealing with EBCDIC to ASCII for 27 years, and it still finds ways to trip me... or is that trap me? One of ...
- Fri Aug 18, 2017 6:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Convert MF Date CYYMMDD to DD-MMM-YY:00:00:00
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7335
Gently, Craig. Ask me to tell the story of the four-page nested IF statement that compiled perfectly and never worked. :wink: DataStage is just not friendly. It gives me many of the same conniptions as Excel, and the leading zero thing is on the short list. ffsw, I suggest going back to the data for...
- Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Convert MF Date CYYMMDD to DD-MMM-YY:00:00:00
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7335
Franklin trots out his Cobol soapbox... :wink: Question the data. Look at the format and ask: was this particular design choice actually necessary? A single digit designating century is far from standard. The first lesson learned out of the Y2K fiasco is that the days of restricted or expensive stor...
- Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Header on import via FTP enterprise stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5329
Franklin, the table definition of sequential file has first row as header, checkbox. I had read these as columns into FTP enterprise. Yes, header reads first row as data row. That should be it, then. You're expecting a sequential file stage read, and FTP doesn't conform to the same processes. Looks...
- Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Header on import via FTP enterprise stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5329
- Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Header on import via FTP enterprise stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5329