Search found 80 matches
- Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Server routines - how to get out infinite looping
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2764
- Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Server routines - how to get out infinite looping
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2764
Server routines - how to get out infinite looping
Dear all I have a few server routines that takes in a variable and parses it out. In short we have a lot of information in our material number and I have to parse out components based on some specific logic. The logic is working great and it returns and tests out great. I just have one concern.. as ...
- Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:13 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Matching question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2444
Matching question
Dear all I am trying to use qualitystage to find matches within our customer master The challenge I have is I do not have a whole lot of input to go off. All I have is a file with two columns customer name and state For this post please assume data is specific to US only. I have not used standardiza...
- Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: range lookup
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7711
- Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: range lookup
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7711
range lookup
I have a problem using range option in the Lookup stage. I need to perform Lookup for the combination of 2 fields: Field1 Comp_Code - one to one lookup Field2 ACCT - range lookup (=>ACCT_from, =<ACCT_to) The stage does not let me to include ACCT_from and ACCT_to to the key. Here is the situation tha...
- Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:00 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Unable to complete setlocale
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3497
- Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:29 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: MNS stage and postal code validation for canada
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3515
- Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:01 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: MNS stage and postal code validation for canada
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3515
MNS stage and postal code validation for canada
Hi we are using MNS to standardize the country, province and postal codes... IN using MNS where we feed the address fields from input for it to process the output, we find that for POSTAL CODES for countries canada and uk which are alpha numeric in nature of lenght 7 with a space after the 3rd chara...
- Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:45 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Survivor ship rule clarification
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2046
Survivor ship rule clarification
Hi I am trying to intepret the survivor ship rules, and we have a need where our rule say for a given field... "Keep survivor info if present otherwise populate Victim or loser Info" I am trying to figure out how this is best done in QS I think I can use Longest as essentially I think it w...
- Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Implicit conversion from source type ustring to string
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2478
Implicit conversion from source type ustring to string
Hi All I am processing a set of flat files of data and I am standardizing using USNAME ruleset I was getting this warning on all the columns generated from the standardization stage when it is used in the next transformer. By default it generates columns of type VARCHAR. My unicode or extended prope...
- Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:56 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Optional Names Handling is disabled
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6961
Hi Great.. as I renamed it to SCNAME to be consistent with NAME being in the end and it seemd to work great job.... I will try to see what happens lenght of the ruleset name Just curious if this is document anywhere as I tried to find it on the IBM site just did not find anything or may be I am look...
- Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:53 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Optional Names Handling is disabled
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6961
Thanks Ray, will mark it as complete but I have one more question before I mark it complete I copied the GBNAME rule set and gave it a custom name as in GBNAME_cp_test Did not change any other aspect of the ruleset and when I use it I do get the optional name handling options enabled for me But when...
- Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:19 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Optional Names Handling is disabled
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6961
- Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:27 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Optional Names Handling is disabled
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6961
Optional Names Handling is disabled
Hi
When I copy the usaddr ruleset and just use it as is without customizing it, I see that the optional names handling is disabled
I changed the permission of the files under the quality folder to match the USADDR files
Any reasons why it is disabled.
Has anyone run into this before
When I copy the usaddr ruleset and just use it as is without customizing it, I see that the optional names handling is disabled
I changed the permission of the files under the quality folder to match the USADDR files
Any reasons why it is disabled.
Has anyone run into this before
- Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:07 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Addresss Standardization and WAVES
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3426
Thanks for the reply. What we are after is address standardization only. Not postal code verification. In that case, just curious if we can just use MNS stage. Just curious what are some of the pain points of using MNS stage In searching through I did not get a lot of hits on MNS stage so just curio...