Search found 37 matches
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: how clever is Dstage supposed to be?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1409
how clever is Dstage supposed to be?
Hi Guys It's been a while. :D I have records going into a transformer and then split either of two ways, one to LN_BSNS and the other to LN_PERSONAL. More often than not, there are no records going down to LN_PERSONAL which in turn does a inner JOIN to a fairly large Dataset. My question is this - s...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Avoid Rouding Off in Parallel Job, 7.5.2 version
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3344
- Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Derivation OK, Compiled code not OK
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2046
- Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Derivation OK, Compiled code not OK
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2046
Derivation OK, Compiled code not OK
Hi guys I experienced a strange error today, but managed to fix it by excluding the piece of code generating the error. I am getting source data that I test whether it's a number using the Num function (removing code not impacting post): If Num(Trim(linkname.column_1,'"',"A")) = 1 The...
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Join Key column data type decision
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1319
Join Key column data type decision
Hi Guys I'm trying to decide if we are overusing varchar data types when doing joins/lookups in Datastage. In 99% of situations we cast data to same varchar types and lengths before doing a join, merge, lookup etc. It may be we're not experienced in using decimals/integers etc, but my real question ...
- Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:53 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Input record sequence number
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10472
sequence number
recieved this code, hope it helps:
Code: Select all
(1 + @INROWNUM + MOD(@PARTITIONNUM, @NUMPARTITIONS)) + ((@INROWNUM -1) * (@NUMPARTITIONS -1))
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: referencing remote hash files
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1959
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: referencing remote hash files
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1959
referencing remote hash files
Hi Guys Normally we would just run the before job subroutine "CLEAR.FILE HASHFILENAME" to clear a hash file in the current project. We have a scenario where we are reading and writing to the same hash file in the same job (aggregating), but need to clear the file before the job runs. The p...
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: "Unrecognized SQL statement" - UNION ALL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2378
- Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: "Unrecognized SQL statement" - UNION ALL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2378
"Unrecognized SQL statement" - UNION ALL
Hi there Is there a known issue when using UNION ALL in the teradata API stage? We have a piece of code: SELECT BLAH, BLAH2 UNION ALL SELECT BLAH3, BLAH4 UNION ALL... (45 UNION ALL statements) that returns a fatal error "Unrecognized SQL statement". We've removed the UNION ALL statements (...
- Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: how to reject data using the join stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2807
Do a left join and bring in the key columns from the RIGHT table/source. Set up a transformer or filter after the join and send data where the RIGHT table/source columns are NULL down the reject link. These will be the rows that did not match to the RIGHT table/source I think i have it right... or i...
- Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Decimal Scale on Calculation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2215
- Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Trimming XML Output for MQ
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1311
Trimming XML Output for MQ
Hi Guys I'm on the verge of finally cracking an XML to MQ problem. Now I need to call ont eh experts :D Steps followed: 1. Created job that creates XML. finished OK 2. Amended job to take XML and write out to MQ stage.. I have one column (the XML) coming from XMLOutput to MQ stage. The data type is ...
- Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Does a messy table definition repository affect performance?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2047
- Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Does a messy table definition repository affect performance?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2047
Does a messy table definition repository affect performance?
Hi Is there a relationship between the number fo table definitions in the repository and the impact on performance of the jobs? I can think that the repository which stores everything will be impacted and that at a minimum job start-up time will be impacted, but will the runtime of a job be impacted...