Search found 43 matches
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Records drop in Transformer.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4072
Re: Records drop in Transformer.
Use null handing. Thanks.
- Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Conbine Records Stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3057
Re: Conbine Records Stage
I think solution is in your warning:
"insert a copy operator between the modify and the upstream operator"
Thanks.
"insert a copy operator between the modify and the upstream operator"
Thanks.
- Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:36 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: date functions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3587
Re: date functions
Following will give next Sunday. If you deduct 7 days, you will get previous Sunday.
Next_Day(to_date(date,'dd-mon-yy'), 'Sunday')
Thanks.
Next_Day(to_date(date,'dd-mon-yy'), 'Sunday')
Thanks.
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance Issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1737
Re: Performance Issue
If your table is partitioned and local indexed, you may use tablename PARTITION (partitionname). So query will use only one partition.
2nd option: Add some to your where clause, so that it could reduce the number of records.
Thanks.
2nd option: Add some to your where clause, so that it could reduce the number of records.
Thanks.
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Upsert in Oracle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3484
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Upsert in Oracle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3484
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:51 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Supported Releases and Operating Systems
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2303
Re: Supported Releases and Operating Systems
Here is a link for that. Installation guide also has the details about the compatibility list.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg27011265
Thanks.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg27011265
Thanks.
- Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Need to delete last 2 records in a flat file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4707
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup Stage - wI/O
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8152
Re: Lookup Stage - wI/O
Since you have only one record for lookup, you can remove lookup and use stage variable in trasformer. Thanks.
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup Stage - wI/O
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8152
Re: Lookup Stage - wI/O
Removing the transformer stage may increase the rate. Thanks.
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:23 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Sorting not working
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3703
Re: Sorting not working
Use copy stage and pass all columns but serial number. Thanks. I have a job that transforms data and assigns a serial number to it. At the end I want all the data to be sorted based on the serial number, but I dont want the see the serial number. DAtaStage works well if the serial number is pulled f...
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Using Basic Transformer in Parallel Job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2141
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error reading sequentail file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9582
Re: Error reading sequentail file
Just after the following warning: Input buffer overrun at field "XXX", at offset: 209 there could be the "Import warning at record ---". Check the source file and check that record. Certainly the length of that record is not in correct size. Thanks. Hi All, I have this error read...
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Db Job Taking Long Runtime After Purge
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1979
Re: Db Job Taking Long Runtime After Purge
If the table is indexed, you may use hint to specify the index. Thanks. Job is taking very long time while doing a select from db2 tables/views. Its a simple job selects from db2 api stage and loads to flat file. There are two tables and two views used in this job. This job was taking only few minut...
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Db Job Taking Long Runtime After Purge
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1979
Re: Db Job Taking Long Runtime After Purge
If the table is indexed, you may use hint to specify the index. Thanks. Job is taking very long time while doing a select from db2 tables/views. Its a simple job selects from db2 api stage and loads to flat file. There are two tables and two views used in this job. This job was taking only few minut...