Search found 520 matches
- Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Need transformation logic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1810
- Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Config file warning...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7036
Swap is physical disk and when configured is identified as swap. You need to get with your OS admin folks to help. As with anything there are various configurations for swap etc... that will affect your implementation, but your initial issue is swap related and has nothing to do with RAM, although r...
- Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Config file warning...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7036
- Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: node setting
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2771
- Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4859
This issue is probably more closely related to how you have defined the record layout and the output record. If you include the Group etc... then it will take a bunch of time to read the data especially with rows that wide. I just had this issue with an 18gb file and 1800 columns and I was able to g...
- Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Output dataset not partitioned as expected
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4261
- Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: hash partioning problem in remove duplicate stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4935
- Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: APT_CombinedOperatorController,0: *** glibc detected *** /op
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2128
inputstring is a pointer and it has not been initialized. strlen is probably throwing the error. To clarify. I would look at the following - compiler flags - are you pointing to the correct glibc? you could be freeing a null pointer which would cause this error could be getting a sigsegv error, but ...
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Update DB2 table takes longer time
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2313
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with a job running under DS81 that ran fine under7.5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1558
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset Management does not work from Director or Designer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2056
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Interesting SQL design conundrum
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3638
I am going to go out on a limb here and give my opinion that as long as the data are not filtered per Kim or Andy's suggestion (not even sure that would work either) and that each instance processes the same table and can run at the same time then it is unlikely that this can be solved with SQL quer...
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset Management does not work from Director or Designer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2056
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Avoid Job Lock
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1435
To build on what Andy has given. Also make sure that if a timeout value is given in the Administrator client that folks do not leave a job open and inactive longer than this time. Also, there are a couple of places where jobs get locked - UniVerse and Websphere. If it is a Websphere lock then a sess...
- Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:45 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with a job running under DS81 that ran fine under7.5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1558
That is actually contrary to what I have seen. I do not use eSame and have not since the first version of this tool. Auto has always worked. Did you see a repartitioner in the score for the job? If the job that created the dataset used in the scd job was partitioned by columns that are different tha...