Search found 17 matches

by ethelvina
Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:20 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

...I checked with DS admin for I/O process during that time and it was quite minimal it seems and so the CPU usage. Something isn't correct here - either your CPU or your ... I'm sorry..I meant to say "I checked with DS admin for I/O process during that time and it was quite minimal it seems a...
by ethelvina
Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:46 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

This issue is probably more closely related to how you have defined the record layout and the output record. If you include the Group etc... then it will take a bunch of time to read the data especially with rows that wide. I just had this issue with an 18gb file and 1800 columns and I was able to ...
by ethelvina
Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:44 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

ArndW wrote:Do you also have "Read from multiple Nodes" turned on? ...
Yes.Its turned on.
by ethelvina
Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:42 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

ArndW wrote:What is your CPU usage during the job run? At the moment you don't know if I/O, I/O per process, or CPU Usage is the bottleneck. ...
I checked with DS admin for I/O process during that time and it was quite minimal it seems and so the CPU usage.
by ethelvina
Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:15 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

This issue is probably more closely related to how you have defined the record layout and the output record. If you include the Group etc... then it will take a bunch of time to read the data especially with rows that wide. I just had this issue with an 18gb file and 1800 columns and I was able to ...
by ethelvina
Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:17 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

How many CPUs does your system have and how many nodes are in your APT_CONFIG_FILE? Can you experiment on timing using multiple readers per node to see if you speed up reading your file (in order to test this, write to a PEEK stage instead of to the dataset) We have 4 nodes in config file. I've rai...
by ethelvina
Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:33 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

You have two problem areas, and I'm not sure which you consider: a) reading from flat file and writing to a dataset b) reading the dataset. Is your mainframe file fixed length? If so, you might ... My Mainframe file is fixed. Here it goes my design for better understanding. I have Mainframe fixed w...
by ethelvina
Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:40 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Performance issue in reading 6GB file
Replies: 15
Views: 4906

Performance issue in reading 6GB file

Hi, All, I have Mainframe file as source and it is of 6GB size and have around 3500 fields. I tried to read this file with Sequential file stage using Schema File and RCP options and pass it to a dataset thru' transformer. It is taking around 25 minutes to read the data from dataset in another job (...
by ethelvina
Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:41 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job compilation takes about 4 hrs
Replies: 17
Views: 6186

I have used this command also dscc in command prompt, this also takes the same time.
by ethelvina
Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:36 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job compilation takes about 4 hrs
Replies: 17
Views: 6186

There are 3 transformers and 3 lookup stages.Input dataset has about 1145 columns and there are 11 output datasets, almost all of the input columns are required.
by ethelvina
Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:57 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job compilation takes about 4 hrs
Replies: 17
Views: 6186

Only this job takes a long time to compile, also this job always takes about 4 hrs to compile.Even import of this job takes about 30 mins.
by ethelvina
Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:36 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job compilation takes about 4 hrs
Replies: 17
Views: 6186

Job compilation takes about 4 hrs

Job compilation takes about 4 hrs, is there any way to reduce the compilation time?
There are 1145 columns in the input file and all the columns are used for transformation.
by ethelvina
Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:28 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: RCP option not available in Pivot stage
Replies: 8
Views: 3950

Actually my requirement was to do develop a parallel job,how can we implement this using server job?Can you please help me on this?
by ethelvina
Mon May 31, 2010 10:49 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: RCP option not available in Pivot stage
Replies: 8
Views: 3950

No I have to use Parallel job only.
by ethelvina
Mon May 31, 2010 10:34 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: RCP option not available in Pivot stage
Replies: 8
Views: 3950

Ya I have checked the PXPivot stage,even this stage is not having RCP option. My requirement is like e.g. Key_A Col_A Col_B...................Col_N 100 fgh abc...................... xyz Then I should get the output as Key_A ColumnNames ColumnValues 100 Col_A fgh 100 Col_B abc ..... ..... ..... 100 C...