I fixed it by addjusting the time out setting on the job performance tab of the job properties.
Thanx for your time
Jim
Search found 364 matches
- Fri Feb 06, 2004 7:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ODBC Time out
- Replies: 2
- Views: 780
- Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ODBC Time out
- Replies: 2
- Views: 780
ODBC Time out
I am having to run a query in an ODBC connection to get the data that I need, but i keep geting the error "ODBC time out expired" Where would I go to increase the time limit?
Jim
Jim
- Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: SQL dates and DS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1402
Re: SQL dates and DS
Try reformatting so that your statement reads oconv(iconv(Input.Update_Date, "D-ymd[4,2,2]"), "D4-YMD[4,2,2]") : Oconv("00:00:00","MTS") replacing the / with -. This seems to have fixed it... oconv(iconv(Input.Update_Date, "D-ymd[4,2,2]"), "D/M...
- Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: SQL dates and DS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1402
Re: SQL dates and DS
ogmios wrote:Which kind of database stage generates the error? There are huge differences between the different kind of stages.
Ogmios
Not sure what u are asking but I have three stages in the job a Sequencial a transformer and an ODBC. Im guessing that the error is originating at teh ODBC stage
Jim
- Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: SQL dates and DS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1402
SQL dates and DS
I have a sequenctial file that has a date field in it. In my transform I use the following code oconv(iconv(Input.Update_Date, "D-ymd[4,2,2]"), "D/MDY[2,2,4]") this outputs correctly. I am tring ot load to a colum of the data type DateTime. I get the following error JOCDEVLoadToS...
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: The Next level of the Transformer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1258
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 7:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: The Next level of the Transformer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1258
The Next level of the Transformer
I have a need to do some fairly simple SQL code in a transformer. This is the bit of code that im confused at: FROM [DM_JOC_AGGR_YR_MTH_TBL] f, [REF_JOC_VARIABLES_LU_TBL] v WHERE f.direction_id = v.direction_id and VDATE_MONTH_ID > v.Rolling_12_Cutoff and the bit that gets me si the > rolling_12_cut...
- Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Upgrade to Version 7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1385
I dont realy see much improvment in performance...I do see alot of improvment in usability of the tool. so in a sence that does help performance, its faster to create jobs now.anupam wrote:Infact we have also upgraded to version 7 for testing, Just wanted to know the Performance Analysis of Version 7
Jim
- Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:34 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Link Collector
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7708
Unfortunatly no one has any idea whats going on here and I have run out of time. I am reverting to the old job with collectors and partitioners. We have just upgraded to vers 7 so I am hopeing that that will help keep this job running smothly. Thanx for all of you guys imput. Jim Jim, In my opinion...
- Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Link Collector
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7708
- Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Upgrade to Version 7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1385
- Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Link Collector
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7708
this is what is confusing me about your theries....... Jim Your issue has been open for weeks. In the meantime, I've answered about 100 posts and done some work myself. My theories are meant to guide you in what to look for in your design. Some other time you will have characters in your data that ...
- Fri Jan 16, 2004 3:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Link Collector
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7708
You have an entry line in the file is what you are saying. You have an extra carriage return/line feed somewhere. Either the data has it embedded in it, or the concatenation is somehow introducing it. You can configure the sequential stage to throw away incomplete rows, or you can configure the seq...
- Fri Jan 16, 2004 3:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Link Collector
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7708
Thought This was dead didnt you.....
NOOO! You probably have omit last newline checked in the sequential stage definition! Just uncheck it. If you have two files, with no last newline delimiter, and concatenate, then the first/last row where the files meet becomes one huge line. Omitting the last newline should be a rarely used option...
- Fri Jan 16, 2004 1:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Job Paramiter using Date datatype
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2495