Do you know of any comparisons that list these differences?vmcburney wrote:Plus there will be a number of things DataStage can do that OWB cannot do.
Search found 9 matches
- Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:06 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Migration from OWB to DataStage
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10677
- Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Join - dealing with different input column names
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3016
Are you getting any error or warning? What is the stage prior to the Join stage? I don't get any error during the design stage. When I pull down the menu for keys to join, the list is blank even that I changed the input names to match where required. I don't know whether this a bug, or something th...
- Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:18 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Join - dealing with different input column names
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3016
... If you rename the column in Join input stage, output stage of the previous gets changed, and hence the actual rename is happening in the previous stage. Agree. So if a rename was made, and I see it, why wouldn't it be enough to accomplish now a join on columns that have identical names on the i...
- Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Join - dealing with different input column names
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3016
- Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Join - dealing with different input column names
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3016
Join - dealing with different input column names
What are the best practices for dealing with joins where the incoming column names don't match? Is there more than one approach? I thought that renaming column(s) under the input tab for a join will work, but it doesn't. If this is the case, which stage(s) are best suited to do this? Thanks for any ...
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Get Max Value using Transaformer stage.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 24206
:? Why not just select only the max record in Oracle? Great question - at least for me. I was looking for posts on 'max' and found this one. I am new to DataStage. One of the questions I am pondering over is where to have most of the logic? Keep most in Oracle or have most in one place for streamli...
- Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Case expression?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1732
- Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Case expression?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1732
Case expression?
I am new to DataStage ... I am migrating an existing ETL to DataStage. Have a spot where there is a case expression between a source table and a target table. How do I implement a case expression in DataStage, e.g. something like this: CASE WHEN col1 IS NOT NULL AND col2 IS NOT NULL AND col3 IS NOT ...
- Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:07 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: [b]shall we use the peek stage as a target[/b]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2976
Re: not getting exactly
not getting exactly. There isn't really antyhing that needs to be added to Ray's posts, but let me try from a newbie perspective... I just started using DataStage and finding the Peek stage very helpfull when developing jobs in steps. Say, if you start from left and don't know what will be exactly ...