Ray
But I don't see any information screen like you said, it just ask if I want to overwrite existing component or not in case of I did not check "overwrite without query" (with or without check "perform impact analysis").
Search found 12 matches
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:30 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: What use for perform impact analysis on import dsx ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2464
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:16 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Datastage sequence - Trigger Multiple Jobs at same time
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2900
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:37 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: What use for perform impact analysis on import dsx ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2464
What use for perform impact analysis on import dsx ?
When you import dsx file, there is an option to perform impact analysis.
But after tested many times I don't see any difference whether I choose it or not(import existing/non-exist component).
What does it really use for?
But after tested many times I don't see any difference whether I choose it or not(import existing/non-exist component).
What does it really use for?
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: About tsort operator on sorted data
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8774
I understand that if I set APT_NO_SORT_INSERTION to True would solve this problem. But actually this is not my concern. The point is I want to know if I leave job design as default (auto partitioning,auto insert sort), the job performance would be as good as manual partitioning and sorting at every ...
- Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: About tsort operator on sorted data
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8774
@BI_RMA I think ds0 and ds 1 has the same definitions ( seq file stage -> sort stage) ds0: {op0[1p] (sequential Sequential_File_1) eOther(APT_HashPartitioner { key={ value=KeyCol, subArgs={ asc } } })<>eCollectAny op2[2p] (parallel APT_CombinedOperatorController(0):Sort_1)} ds1: {op1[1p] (sequential...
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: About tsort operator on sorted data
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8774
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: About tsort operator on sorted data
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8774
About tsort operator on sorted data
If data have been sorted (Sort Stage) and then DataStage auto inserted tsort operator (Join Stage - same key as Sort Stage), is it actually re-sort data again? I've created test job like this Seq_1 ---> Sort_1 ---> Copy_1 ---> Join_Stage --->Copy_3 Seq_2 ---> Sort_2 ---> Copy_2 ---^ Some of job scor...
- Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:30 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Is there a way to encrypt/hide custom rule sets in Designer?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4118
Is there a way to encrypt/hide custom rule sets in Designer?
Is there a way to encrypt/hide custom rule sets in Designer? (For prevent copy)
But all jobs that use this rule set can still executable.
But all jobs that use this rule set can still executable.
- Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:42 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Unduplicate Independent vs Transitive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3574
Unduplicate Independent vs Transitive
I read the document about these two methods but still I don't understand the difference.
Can someone explain the difference with some example?
Thank you.
Can someone explain the difference with some example?
Thank you.
- Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:47 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Best method for update table on non-indexed columns
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2353
- Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Best method for update table on non-indexed columns
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2353
Best method for update table on non-indexed columns
What is the best method for update table on non-indexed columns (where condition on indexed column? If the table has about 100 million records which is the best method? 1. Datasets -> DB Stage using upsert command. 2. Datasets -> DB Stage using Load command then using SQL update join in the next job...
- Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:48 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Many to Many reference match with multiple pass?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3230
Many to Many reference match with multiple pass?
Since the option in reference match stage are many to one and one to one.
Is there a way to do many to many match for multiple pass?
Is there a way to do many to many match for multiple pass?