Search found 5 matches
- Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 Get Table Partitioning Information error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4688
- Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 UPSERT , Records silently rejected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4373
@miwinter : I don't see a possiblity of that. This is a heavy duty production with large resources. These inserts are more over simple and low cost. Hence I don't think there is a contention. @Shamanth_vk : That is the challenge I am facing. I cannot modify the production job as it is protected. I c...
- Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 UPSERT , Records silently rejected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4373
- Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 UPSERT , Records silently rejected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4373
By Clean up I just delete the records that got loaded in the most recent run. As I said only 20-30% gets in and the remaining get silently rejected. So before rerunning I will delete the partial set of records to mainitain the data integrity. I too thought of Unique key violation as the cause. But n...
- Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 UPSERT , Records silently rejected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4373
DB2 UPSERT , Records silently rejected
Hi All, We have job that loads data into a table on UPSERT mode. The Update SQL has been maked with a "1=0" condition in its where clause. The destination table has a single column as key and is the LD_SEQ_I. LD_SEQ_I is set as auto increment at a database level. Basically every record com...