Search found 78 matches
- Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with sequential file and file name column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3178
Affected to? To quote The Princess Bride: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by 'affected to' in this context? :? sorry, my mother tongue is french and not english. well, in mean, in the sequential stage, I defin...
- Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with sequential file and file name column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3178
Well, my logic is the following I take one or more files in input and I sort them by date. I remove duplicate by taking the more recent line. So, I have 2 lines with the same key in the 090309 and in the 090311, but the line in the 090309 is affected to the 090311, so my remove duplicate becomes wro...
- Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with sequential file and file name column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3178
Problem with sequential file and file name column
I have a strange problem when reading files in sequential stage. I read 3 files 090309.sdi,090310.sdi and 090311.sdi with pattern file option. I use the option file name column to associate each line with the corresponding file. But, some lines in the 090309.sdi are affected to the 090311.sdi file. ...
- Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job Sequence
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2774
- Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: how to know which processes are created by running a job?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4278
- Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sequecer abort issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1752
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: StringToTimestamp err
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7900
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Main sequence getting aborted
- Replies: 23
- Views: 10362
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Main sequence getting aborted
- Replies: 23
- Views: 10362
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: StringToTimestamp err
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7900
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: StringToTimestamp err
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7900
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: StringToTimestamp err
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7900
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Resource Unavailable Error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1683
- Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: UDB API stage deadlock or timeout Reason code SQLSTATE=57033
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1961
When you delete in the table, there is an exclusive lock on the table, and you can't execute another delete statement on the same table, even if the set of records are differents. If you partitionned the table you should execute your delete statement in parallel. You could also create a specific del...
- Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: delete on db2 table
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2410