Thanks Ray,
Cheers,
Munish
Search found 89 matches
- Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1348
- Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1348
Oracle Stage
Hi All, Could I please request you champs to comment on the following: Question/Suggestion related to Oracle Stage: 1. Original question which we have sorted out: "We are planning to use bitmap indexes on our fact tables. We're currently experiencing some issues with our ETL load due to the way...
- Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Input buffer overrun at field
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7422
- Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: OCI Stage: Indexes in Unusable State
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4164
- Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: OCI Stage: Indexes in Unusable State
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4164
- Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: OCI Stage: Indexes in Unusable State
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4164
OCI Stage: Indexes in Unusable State
Hi Champs, I am using Oracle Load to load my fact table. Volume: 280 mills per load. The DB is partitioned by date. We have 7 bitmap indexes on this table. The problem starts after the data is loaded and when OCI stage tries to rebuild the indexes and it is failing there. The error: ORA-01502: index...
- Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem while loading Oracle Tables
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3359
- Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem while loading Oracle Tables
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3359
index is in unusable state
Hi Champs, I am using Oracle Load to load my fact table. Volume: 280 mills per load. The DB is partitioned by date. We have 7 bitmap indexes on this table. The problem starts after the data is loaded and when OCI stage tries to rebuild the indexes and it is failing there. The error: ORA-01502: index...
- Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:55 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Merge or Join, Which is more efficient
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1696
Sure, Would definitely do that. It is one of things to do in our SVT. In current job, Source 1: Key values + sum Source 2 : Key valued + count join output: Keyvalues + Sum + Count. Thus, it is very simple inner join. We have started the development with JOIN stage, however we are going to compare it...
- Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Merge or Join, Which is more efficient
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1696
Merge or Join, Which is more efficient
Hi All,
My job can be done by
either Merge or Join.
I was just wondering which one is more efficient, considering the DataSet may have around 300 mills rows.
Thanks,
Munish
My job can be done by
either Merge or Join.
I was just wondering which one is more efficient, considering the DataSet may have around 300 mills rows.
Thanks,
Munish
- Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:24 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator, Restricting count for individual group
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4827
Thanks to all of you for giving helpful advices. It is done. A few facts to share: 1. Tall/Head stage: It gets the top or bottom values from each of the node. Since our dev env has 2 nodes. It was getting the records one from each node. Got it rolling: Once I did the aggregation > used sort stage wi...
- Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator, Restricting count for individual group
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4827
1. My sort stage where I am using Key_Change property has 3 keys only. Ac_N,Serv_N,Period_K 2. Use of first sort stage is to make the aggregator work easier. (We are anticipating 280 Mills rows in one batch.) 3. KeyChange is doing right be putting 1 whenever key combination (Ac_N,Serv_N,Period_K ) c...
- Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator, Restricting count for individual group
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4827
- Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator, Restricting count for individual group
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4827
- Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator, Restricting count for individual group
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4827
Hi All, I am very near to solve this mystery. as per the suggestions, what I plan to do Sort>> Aggregate >> Sort (Group and respective amt (descending)) >> Another Sort (For Keychange)>> Filter stage (restrict Keychage Counter) However, I am held up at use KeyChange column for the counter when I use...