yes.... exactlyray.wurlod wrote:Did you mean ORD_I = '0009000311_______________________ ' ? ...
Search found 35 matches
- Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Records going to peek stage........
- Replies: 27
- Views: 8788
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Records going to peek stage........
- Replies: 27
- Views: 8788
- Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Some issues in Duplicate records
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1348
Re: Some issues in Duplicate records
IF you can use a join and aggregator stage, then 1. Create a copy of input records in 2 streams. 2. on 1st stream, aggregate on event id to get the max value of transactions (MAX_TRANS) done. 3. join 2nd stream from step 1 with the results of step 2, to attach the MAX_TRANS for each event id. 4. Def...
- Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Date conversation
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4118
- Fri May 18, 2007 10:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Modify Stage - Implicit conversion
- Replies: 12
- Views: 10989
Re: Modify Stage - Implicit conversion
Hi I am trying to configure the modify stage. The job execute with success, but with warning in log: Modify_12: When checking operator: When binding output schema variable "outRec": When binding output interface field "FXCRMCDPCC" to field "FXCRMCDPCC": Implicit conver...