Search found 190 matches
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Close Command on DB2 Enterprise Stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3467
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How can I generate ETL stats on all jobs in a project?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 16813
Thanks chulett, you're right I've no previous idea about this feature in DataStage and it's urgent as the client needs such an ETL report and I need to know how to implement first, and how much time it will take. Thanks again. sorry to disappoint you but in this forum nothing is urgent as everyone ...
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to decide which partition to be used in which stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2711
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: fork function failed
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4916
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: how to decide using lookup or joiner
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4311
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle stored procedure job running long time from DS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4317
How does your job look like? When you run it using the Stored Procedure stage, all it does is pass the parameters back to the database so in essence it should be the same. I done it before and performance is the same. Has this problem just happened recently? has your job been able to run well in the...
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Less row count with DSDB2PX Stage
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5461
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fork() failed. Not enough space.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5375
- Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:24 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: need help in using the stored procedure stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4103
Hi, If your stored procedures expects parameters then you need to pass these onto the stage. Typically you will need to have input parameters and output parameters. The data type for the parameters must match up to what the stored procedure is expecting. Other than that it's the same as any other st...
- Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Shared Container
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2088
- Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle Enterprise Execution mode
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3452
Don't think the two jobs are the same. At least internally the parallel job would or may be rehashing the data while the server job wouldn't. If the volume is small then the server job having less repartitioning/rehashing of data will finish quicker. In order to answer this type of question as chule...
- Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: what exactly is dataset and where the file will be created
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2354
- Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: XMETA Password Expired in DB2 Respository
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5772
- Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Difference between sort stage and link sort
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5951
- Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:57 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup on variable length values
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5277
As far as I know, you'll need cascading lookups - five of them set to continue if they fail. First one checks for a substring of 7, the next 6, etc. ... Many Thanks chulett for your reply and interest , i've thinked in that but is there is any other method to make it dynamicaly , i'm afraid of any ...