Search found 78 matches
- Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Distributed Transaction Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3013
- Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:16 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: How to assign $Var value to Param value
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4714
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Issue with Random() function
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7105
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Messages are deleting from Queue if job aborts
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3333
If your target database is compatible with a DTS stage (and ofcourse if you have it and if your release support it) you could use that - and messages are handled within the job the way you want it without any additional logic. But in the end i guess it comes down to what the business want you to do ...
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Read SQL into Datastage job
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6697
are the number of columns in the sql query dynamic ? if its always 3 columns? What do you mean by process the data ? Would it be different for each table the data is extracted from ? You could fetch the value in column D querying this table from a sequencer and pass the output sql as a parameter to ...
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Read SQL into Datastage job
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6697
are the number of columns in the sql query dynamic ? if its always 3 columns? What do you mean by process the data ? Would it be different for each table the data is extracted from ? You could fetch the value in column D querying this table from a sequencer and pass the output sql as a parameter to ...
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Issue with Random() function
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7105
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Messages are deleting from Queue if job aborts
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3333
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Environment Variable + Stage Name
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1524
- Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Query about writing expression
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2184
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to handle this logic?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 8879
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6175
Sorry, I guess thats a silly question - since you have already used the same metadata to do seperate INSERT/UPDATE query tests. Could you try deleting that stage and redoing the properties with a new one to ensure you havent got anything hanging in it from another query/job if you copied the stage f...
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6175
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to handle this logic?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 8879
I would try running the job sequentially to ensure that you have the stage variable logic right first before being worried about the partitioning.. (i know not ideal) But you could get one issue out of the way.. You could still Hash it before the xfm on ACC_NO, REC_NO usage as sort only... That will...
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:25 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Record Count in Transformer
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6623