Ray, if a file has records with different layout, can this file be processed using a CFF ??ray.wurlod wrote:Yes it does. ...
Search found 193 matches
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: cannot able to read the records of variable lenghts
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2350
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:36 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5077
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2665
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2665
Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed
Hi, Most companies use DS for DataWarehousing etc and we are using it for our Application Developement. DS is a new product in our place and ours is the first group to be tried out. We are in the learning curve and in the short time, have grasped the tools' capabilities/power etc, and at the same no...
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5077
Supposed to be that functionality in 8.x but for now I still do it the Old Fashioned Way: two dsx exports and a good compare utility, like Ultra Compare for example. ... Thanks chulett for guiding towards UltraCompare. Would give it a try. For now, we have no means to do know what has changed from ...
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:00 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: optimum stages per job?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1676
Re: optimum stages per job?
being new to DS we had a bunch of very expensive IBM consultants recommend how to structure our jobs. In general we found them very helpful. one area in which they were quite adament was in us NOT landing the data (notwithstanding restart considerations) for performance reasons. This dictated very ...
- Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5077
Version Control: How do you do at your place
Hi, Please help me out with Version Control. As per IBM,DS-VC isn't that helpful, and most of them use PVCS/VSS etc for Version Control. How do you guyz do at your shop? Also If a team member has made a change in a Job, how would another member know what EXACT change the other person has made. Is th...
- Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:51 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Best parcatices for business logic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1062
I would first try to build it using a lookup table, though this depends on whether the equation fits a lookup table design. Second I would try stage variable code which works well for up to three lines of code per stage variable but is stretched beyond that. Third is probably external routine so yo...
- Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:47 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Filter stage does not work
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2056
- Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Filter stage does not work
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2056
If you are on v7.5.1a or above, I'd personally go for single Transformer stage rather than using Modify plus Filter. Yes I would second that. We had few Filters in our application because we felt Filter fits in the role, but the IBM experts suggested otherwise. [to use a Parallel Transformer instea...
- Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Pivot and Build-ops
- Replies: 1
- Views: 791
Parallel Pivot and Build-ops
Hi, We started using Pivot [though not in parallel mode] and was advised to go for build-ops, which would be better in performance. But of late, realised that Pivot Stage can be used in Parallel mode and it looks like the performance is in par with that and infact slightly better than that of build-...
- Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Input buffer overrun at field
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7419
Re: Input buffer overrun at field
Hi I am facing this below warning message. FF_LYHIER,0: Input buffer overrun at field "Field015", at offset: 52 Please some give a suggetion. regards konda If your input data doesn't exactly match with the table definition, you will face this. Make sure the table definition matches with i...
- Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: calling Job parameters
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2563
- Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sort and Aggregation Options
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1496
- Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer Constraint and Rejects
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5008
Good suggestion chullett . I guess that is more appropriate in his case. He can use this approach in case all records rejected are not getting processed . I prefer the other approach since i need to process some of the records which are also rejected , so that we can report those as data which has ...