Search found 193 matches

by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:41 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: cannot able to read the records of variable lenghts
Replies: 7
Views: 2350

ray.wurlod wrote:Yes it does. ...
Ray, if a file has records with different layout, can this file be processed using a CFF ??
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:36 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
Replies: 18
Views: 5077

DSguru2B wrote:
ray.wurlod wrote:Comparing the two DSX files with diff does show you what's changed.
You read my mind. But ftp'ing the files every time is a pain.
You both mean comparing two .dsx with diff option using UltraCompare ??!! Clarify Pls. Thanks
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed
Replies: 10
Views: 2665

ray.wurlod wrote:Planning and Peer Review
Before you even touch DataStage, sketch out your plan of attack. Which stage types will you use, and why. Sources and targets - are their table definitions in Reposi ...
thanks Ray..It helps.
Any other suggestions/best practices are welcome and appreciated.
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed
Replies: 10
Views: 2665

Good Debugging Practices:Guidance needed

Hi, Most companies use DS for DataWarehousing etc and we are using it for our Application Developement. DS is a new product in our place and ours is the first group to be tried out. We are in the learning curve and in the short time, have grasped the tools' capabilities/power etc, and at the same no...
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
Replies: 18
Views: 5077

Supposed to be that functionality in 8.x but for now I still do it the Old Fashioned Way: two dsx exports and a good compare utility, like Ultra Compare for example. ... Thanks chulett for guiding towards UltraCompare. Would give it a try. For now, we have no means to do know what has changed from ...
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:00 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: optimum stages per job?
Replies: 7
Views: 1676

Re: optimum stages per job?

being new to DS we had a bunch of very expensive IBM consultants recommend how to structure our jobs. In general we found them very helpful. one area in which they were quite adament was in us NOT landing the data (notwithstanding restart considerations) for performance reasons. This dictated very ...
by vijayrc
Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:52 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Version Control: How do you do at your place
Replies: 18
Views: 5077

Version Control: How do you do at your place

Hi, Please help me out with Version Control. As per IBM,DS-VC isn't that helpful, and most of them use PVCS/VSS etc for Version Control. How do you guyz do at your shop? Also If a team member has made a change in a Job, how would another member know what EXACT change the other person has made. Is th...
by vijayrc
Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:51 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Best parcatices for business logic
Replies: 3
Views: 1062

I would first try to build it using a lookup table, though this depends on whether the equation fits a lookup table design. Second I would try stage variable code which works well for up to three lines of code per stage variable but is stretched beyond that. Third is probably external routine so yo...
by vijayrc
Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:47 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Filter stage does not work
Replies: 9
Views: 2056

Helpful article: Is DS Parallel Transformer Evil? Vincent quotes " Over my years of using parallel jobs I haven't noticed that much of an overhead and when you use the transformer for several tasks (transform, filter and copy) it can be faster. " Exactly...Until the Parallel Transformer, ...
by vijayrc
Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:26 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Filter stage does not work
Replies: 9
Views: 2056

If you are on v7.5.1a or above, I'd personally go for single Transformer stage rather than using Modify plus Filter. Yes I would second that. We had few Filters in our application because we felt Filter fits in the role, but the IBM experts suggested otherwise. [to use a Parallel Transformer instea...
by vijayrc
Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:58 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Parallel Pivot and Build-ops
Replies: 1
Views: 791

Parallel Pivot and Build-ops

Hi, We started using Pivot [though not in parallel mode] and was advised to go for build-ops, which would be better in performance. But of late, realised that Pivot Stage can be used in Parallel mode and it looks like the performance is in par with that and infact slightly better than that of build-...
by vijayrc
Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:54 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Input buffer overrun at field
Replies: 7
Views: 7419

Re: Input buffer overrun at field

Hi I am facing this below warning message. FF_LYHIER,0: Input buffer overrun at field "Field015", at offset: 52 Please some give a suggetion. regards konda If your input data doesn't exactly match with the table definition, you will face this. Make sure the table definition matches with i...
by vijayrc
Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:06 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: calling Job parameters
Replies: 8
Views: 2563

DSguru2B wrote:Call :? , You mean use. Yes, by surrounding them with hashes (#). ...
So if CNY is a Job Parameter defined, then should I use #CNY# to refer to this job parameter value in the Transformer ???
by vijayrc
Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:31 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Sort and Aggregation Options
Replies: 3
Views: 1496

ray.wurlod wrote:Or, if there's some reason not to sort by GK4 and GK5 up front (for example you may not have them until you've performed a lookup or join) then Option 2 is definitiely to be preferred - but you MUST p ...
Thanks Ray..I'm going to go with Option2
by vijayrc
Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:29 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Transformer Constraint and Rejects
Replies: 8
Views: 5008

Good suggestion chullett . I guess that is more appropriate in his case. He can use this approach in case all records rejected are not getting processed . I prefer the other approach since i need to process some of the records which are also rejected , so that we can report those as data which has ...