Search found 219 matches
- Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
- Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
Actually, Craig did specifically ask him to remove the Exception Handler. Oops! i had misinterperted your statement. Sorry for that. Parag, Also post your custom trigger code. Hey Not a problem... Basically for e.g, My job design after using custom trigger, is restartable. There are 3 subsequences ...
- Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:45 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
Craig did not ask you to remove exception handler. He had asked you to remove custom triggers and use OK triggers instead. May be you have not read my full reply properly. I've done the same thing...Later I said the alternative to it is to use the custom trigger. May be if you have some good soluti...
- Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
Hi Chulett, As you suggested, I tried running the master sequence after removing the exception handler and kept the triggers intact. But still the master sequence was showing 'Finished(See Log)'. And it was not getting aborted. I think the only way is now to connect each subsequence activity to a se...
- Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
That's not how the Exception Handler works. And adding it overrides the 'automatically handle' option. Remove it, use just OK triggers and let us know what happens. ... As per the documentation on 'Automatically Handle' option, It will not work if there are any sort of triggers involved. And if the...
- Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
- Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Master Sequence is not restartable
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7078
Master Sequence is not restartable
After browsing through all the posts on restartability, I am still not able to achieve it in my scenario. The condition goes like: - We are having a scenario where we are having multiple subsequences. Lets say S1, S2, S3 Now these sequences are having a custom trigger where we are checking job statu...
- Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Query Regarding Change Capture stage malfunction
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3259
This is what the documentation says: The stage assumes that the incoming data is key-partitioned and sorted in ascending order. The columns the data is hashed on should be the key columns used for the data compare. You can achieve the sorting and partitioning using the Sort stage or by using the bu...
- Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:26 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Query Regarding Change Capture stage malfunction
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3259
Query Regarding Change Capture stage malfunction
I am having following scenario: - I am doing a change capture between the source table and the target table. In source table I am taking the incremental load. currently the data present in both source and target is: - SOURCE: - RefNO. ApplicantNo. ApplicantID Val1 Val2 111 1 1 Y N 111 1 1 NULL NULL ...
- Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Jobs aborting due to unknown error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 928
Jobs aborting due to unknown error
Hi, When we are running the jobs or sequences, we are getting the following error and it is getting aborted: - main_program: Internal Error: (APT_SC::downcast(pConsumer())->kind() == APT_Operator::eParallel): sc/sc.C: 3984 Traceback: Could not obtain stack trace; check that 'dbx' and 'sed' are insta...
- Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job aborting due to memory issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3149
- Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job aborting due to memory issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3149
- Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job aborting due to memory issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3149
Job aborting due to memory issue
Hi All, After reading many posts in the forum and trying many options given, My job is still failing due to insufficient memory. The error I am getting is: - Lkp_CoverDetail_Ins_Upd,0: Could not map table file "/u03/Datasets/lookuptable.20071219.suos0lb (size 1700927896 bytes)": Not enough...
- Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Getting warning when doing calculations in OCI stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 788
- Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Getting warning when doing calculations in OCI stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 788
Getting warning when doing calculations in OCI stage
I am using the OCI stage as aninput source for one of my job. I have to do a calculation on two date fields and take the difference of dates in years. Finally I have to apply a floor function on it. So the final code in query is : - FLOOR((MONTHS_BETWEEN(QED.QUOTE_DATE, IP.BIRTH_DATE)/12)) AS "...